What Is Subjectivity in Womens History and Gender Studies

In postmodernist theory,  subjectivity  means to take the perspective of the individual self, rather than some neutral,  objective, perspective, from outside the selfs experience.   Feminist theory takes note that in much of the writing about history, philosophy and psychology, the male experience is usually the focus.   A womens history approach to history takes seriously the selves of individual women, and their lived experience, not just as linked to the experience of males. As an approach to womens history, subjectivity looks at how a woman herself (the subject) lived and saw her role in life.   Subjectivity takes seriously the experience of women as human beings and individuals.   Subjectivity looks at how women saw their activities and roles as contributing (or not) to her identity and meaning. Subjectivity is an attempt to see history from the perspective of the individuals who lived that history, especially including ordinary women. Subjectivity requires taking seriously womens consciousness. Key features of a subjective approach to womens history: it is a qualitative rather than quantitative studyemotion is taken seriouslyit requires a kind of historic empathy it takes seriously the lived experience of women In the subjective approach, the historian asks not only how gender defines womens treatment, occupations, and so on, but also how women perceive the personal, social and political meanings of being female. From Nancy F. Cott and Elizabeth H. Pleck, A Heritage of Her Own, Introduction. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy explains it this way: Since women have been cast as lesser forms of the masculine individual, the paradigm of the self that has gained ascendancy in U.S. popular culture and in Western philosophy is derived from the experience of the predominantly white and heterosexual, mostly economically advantaged men who have wielded social, economic, and political power and who have dominated the arts, literature, the media, and scholarship.   Thus, an approach that considers subjectivity may redefine cultural concepts even of the self because that concept has represented a male norm rather than a more general human norm -- or rather, the male norm has been taken to  be  the equivalent of the general human norm, not taking into account actual experiences and consciousness of women. Others have noted that male philosophical and psychological history is often based on the idea of separating from the mother in order to develop a self -- and so maternal bodies are seen as instrumental to human (usually male) experience. Simone de Beauvoir, when she wrote  Ã¢â‚¬Å"He is the Subject, he is the Absolute—she is the Other,†Ã‚  summarized the problem for feminists that subjectivity is meant to address: that through most of human history, philosophy and history have seen the world through male eyes, seeing other men as part of the subject of history, and seeing women as Other, non-subjects, secondary, even aberrations. Ellen Carol DuBois is among those who challenged this emphasis: There is a very sneaky kind of antifeminism here... because it tends to ignore politics. (Politics and Culture in Womens History,  Feminist Studies  1980.) Other womens history scholars find that the subjective approach enriches political analysis. Subjectivity theory has also been applied to other studies, including examining history (or other fields) from a standpoint of postcolonialism, multiculturalism, and anti-racism. In the womens movement, the slogan the personal is political was another form of recognizing subjectivity.   Rather than analyzing issues as if they were objective, or outside of the people analyzing, feminists looked at personal experience, woman as subject. Objectivity The goal of  objectivity  in the study of history refers to having a perspective that is free of bias, personal perspective, and personal interest.   A critique of this idea is at the core of many feminist and post-modernist approaches to history: the idea that one can step completely outside ones own history,experience and perspective is an illusion.   All accounts of history choose which facts to include and which to exclude, and come to conclusions that are opinions and interpretations.   Its not possible to completely know ones own prejudices or to see the world from other than ones own perspective, this theory proposes.   Thus, most traditional studies of history, by leaving out the experience of women, pretend to be objective but in fact are also subjective. Feminist theorist Sandra Harding has developed a theory that research which is based on womens actual experiences is actually more objective than the usual androcentric (male-centered) historical approaches.   She calls this strong objectivity.   In this view, rather than simply rejecting objectivity, the historian uses the experience of those usually considered other -- including women -- to add to the total picture of history.