Five Themes Of Baptism, Eucharist And Ministry - 966 Words

Five Themes in Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry In the Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry Document (BEM), there are five themes used to describe Eucharist. These common themes between many churches are thanksgiving, memorial, invocation, the communal aspect and eschatological future concept. These themes provide a wide context for the Eucharist meal and how the body of Christ interprets the meal from their denominational tradition. In the BEM document the Triune God is represented by thanksgiving, memorial and invocation in three themes. In this construct, God the Father is presented as the provider – the One who has provided life full of blessings. This includes creating, protecting and saving humanity. Eucharist serves as our thankful attitude toward a forgiving and loving God. In the second theme and second part of the Trinity, Eucharist serves as a memorial of the Son. As commanded to the disciples, we remember the love expressed for us. This simple supper provides intimate ti me with Christ as he extends presence to us. Because Christ defeated death, our status as redeemed enable direct connection with him in the meal with him as our â€Å"High Priest and Intercessor† (BEM, pg. 4 B.8). The Spirit as the third part of the Trinity and third theme makes Christ’s presence available as a response to the invocation of the people of God. The Spirit transforms the Eucharist into the signs of body and blood of Christ upon the action desired by the Father. The church invokes the SpiritShow MoreRelatedSacred Scripture2629 Words   |  11 PagesThis is ONLY for those who MISSED Friday. The names of God. Lord: Adonai (Hebrew) LORD: Yahweh or Jehovah or I am who I am. God: Elohim (Hebrew). God Almighty: El Shaddai. Most ancient Jews thought that Moses wrote the Torah/Pentateuch (first five books of the Bible: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy). Moses is traditionally thought to have lived in the 1200sBC. The names of God appear to differ systematically in the Torah. J source: used Yahweh/Jehovah. E source: used Elohim/GodRead MoreOrdination Questions For Elder. Theology10615 Words   |  43 PagesTheology (Some essentials of Wesleyan theology†¦original sin, divinity of Christ, atonement, justification by faith, work of the Holy Spirit, regeneration (new birth) and trinity) 1.) How has the practice of ministry affected your experience and understanding of: a.) God—The practice of ministry has given me numerous opportunities to interact with people at different stages in life’s journey†¦birth, death, marriage, divorce, sorrow, struggle, celebration, and so much more. These relationships haveRead MoreThe Gospel of John Essay5342 Words   |  22 Pagesthe theological foundations that undergird the events of Jesus life. He reaches to the deeper baptism and the calling of the Twelve are doubtless presupposed, they are not actually described. Even themes central to the Synoptics have almost disappeared: in particular, the kingdom of God or the kingdom of heaven, so much a part of the preaching of Jesus in the Synoptic Gospels and the central theme of His narrative parables, is scarcely mentioned as such (cf. 3:3, 5; 18:36). meaning of the eventsRead MoreBibl 323 Mod 3 Notes Essay6886 Words   |  28 PagesOutline The Third Sign (John 5:1–16) The setting (John 5:1–5). â€Å"Some time later, Jesus went up to Jerusalem for the feast of the Jews. Now there is in Jerusalem near the sheep gate a pool, which in Aramaic is called Bethesda and which is surrounded by five covered colonnades. Here a great number of disabled people used to lie—the blind, the lame, and the paralyzed. For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water

What Is Subjectivity in Womens History and Gender Studies

In postmodernist theory,  subjectivity  means to take the perspective of the individual self, rather than some neutral,  objective, perspective, from outside the selfs experience.   Feminist theory takes note that in much of the writing about history, philosophy and psychology, the male experience is usually the focus.   A womens history approach to history takes seriously the selves of individual women, and their lived experience, not just as linked to the experience of males. As an approach to womens history, subjectivity looks at how a woman herself (the subject) lived and saw her role in life.   Subjectivity takes seriously the experience of women as human beings and individuals.   Subjectivity looks at how women saw their activities and roles as contributing (or not) to her identity and meaning. Subjectivity is an attempt to see history from the perspective of the individuals who lived that history, especially including ordinary women. Subjectivity requires taking seriously womens consciousness. Key features of a subjective approach to womens history: it is a qualitative rather than quantitative studyemotion is taken seriouslyit requires a kind of historic empathy it takes seriously the lived experience of women In the subjective approach, the historian asks not only how gender defines womens treatment, occupations, and so on, but also how women perceive the personal, social and political meanings of being female. From Nancy F. Cott and Elizabeth H. Pleck, A Heritage of Her Own, Introduction. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy explains it this way: Since women have been cast as lesser forms of the masculine individual, the paradigm of the self that has gained ascendancy in U.S. popular culture and in Western philosophy is derived from the experience of the predominantly white and heterosexual, mostly economically advantaged men who have wielded social, economic, and political power and who have dominated the arts, literature, the media, and scholarship.   Thus, an approach that considers subjectivity may redefine cultural concepts even of the self because that concept has represented a male norm rather than a more general human norm -- or rather, the male norm has been taken to  be  the equivalent of the general human norm, not taking into account actual experiences and consciousness of women. Others have noted that male philosophical and psychological history is often based on the idea of separating from the mother in order to develop a self -- and so maternal bodies are seen as instrumental to human (usually male) experience. Simone de Beauvoir, when she wrote  Ã¢â‚¬Å"He is the Subject, he is the Absolute—she is the Other,†Ã‚  summarized the problem for feminists that subjectivity is meant to address: that through most of human history, philosophy and history have seen the world through male eyes, seeing other men as part of the subject of history, and seeing women as Other, non-subjects, secondary, even aberrations. Ellen Carol DuBois is among those who challenged this emphasis: There is a very sneaky kind of antifeminism here... because it tends to ignore politics. (Politics and Culture in Womens History,  Feminist Studies  1980.) Other womens history scholars find that the subjective approach enriches political analysis. Subjectivity theory has also been applied to other studies, including examining history (or other fields) from a standpoint of postcolonialism, multiculturalism, and anti-racism. In the womens movement, the slogan the personal is political was another form of recognizing subjectivity.   Rather than analyzing issues as if they were objective, or outside of the people analyzing, feminists looked at personal experience, woman as subject. Objectivity The goal of  objectivity  in the study of history refers to having a perspective that is free of bias, personal perspective, and personal interest.   A critique of this idea is at the core of many feminist and post-modernist approaches to history: the idea that one can step completely outside ones own history,experience and perspective is an illusion.   All accounts of history choose which facts to include and which to exclude, and come to conclusions that are opinions and interpretations.   Its not possible to completely know ones own prejudices or to see the world from other than ones own perspective, this theory proposes.   Thus, most traditional studies of history, by leaving out the experience of women, pretend to be objective but in fact are also subjective. Feminist theorist Sandra Harding has developed a theory that research which is based on womens actual experiences is actually more objective than the usual androcentric (male-centered) historical approaches.   She calls this strong objectivity.   In this view, rather than simply rejecting objectivity, the historian uses the experience of those usually considered other -- including women -- to add to the total picture of history.

How Of An Industrial Eater - 941 Words

How to Identify an Industrial Eater in 2015 Wendell Berry first introduces the term industrial eater as â€Å"one who does not know that eating is an agricultural act, who no longer knows or imagines the connections between eating and the land, who is therefore necessarily passive and uncritical – in short, a victim† (6). This definition in multiple ways needs revising; it should reflect the changing culture of America. Industrial eaters enjoy processed foods because when we crave them we are craving an essential vitamin from a natural whole food. Processed foods are cheaper and more readily available, which contributes to the culture of the industrial eater. Nearly all foods today are modified or processed in some way from their natural state, which only enforces the point that we live in an increasingly processed society that produces industrial eaters like it processes doughnuts on an assembly line: rapidly and with little to no individuality (in reference to their c onsumption of food.) An industrial eater in today’s society differs from the definition provided by Wendell Berry; it has expanded. I now choose to include foods that have been produced with synthetic fertilizers and pesticides as well as the food-like substances within the parameters of the diet of the industrial eater. Whole foods are foods that were at one time not modified in any way, for example apples that were not sprayed with synthetic pesticides and potatoes not grown in synthetic fertilizers, but mostShow MoreRelatedThe Pleasure Of Eating By Wendell Berry864 Words   |  4 Pagesby Wendell Berry. Wendell writes in verity ways of ethos, logos and pathos including examples to connect with the reader and to provide the reader a better idea of how society is not involved with the origins of what they are taking home for dinner; due to their busy lives they have. Wendell Berry starts with ethos, by expressing how most people have one perspective of where food comes. Without them knowing the little details behind the process. He states that most of them liberate the idea thatRead MoreEssay on Pleasures of Eating1044 Words   |  5 PagesAundrenee Nash Writing 121 Chris Jensen May 10 2013 The Pleasures of Eating Summary and Response In â€Å"The Pleasures of Eating† Wendell Berry wants the reader to recognize that eating is a cultural act. He believes we are eaters not consumers and that we should have more knowledge about the food we eat. Berry wants the reader to questions where the food is coming from, what condition is it produced in and what chemicals may it contains. He has found that the food industries blind us to whatRead MoreThe Pleasures Of Eating By Wendell Berry959 Words   |  4 Pagesinto our mouths but, no, it’s starts when â€Å"food† is grown in farms. We often forget or don’t care where our food comes from, we only see it as a product and if we are aware, then, so what? We don’t give much thought into it. To us, it doesn’t matter how fresh, clean, pure it is or why it costs so much or so little. We have become so passive with what is sold to us that are standards for food aren’t held as high anymore. We’ve become so lazy and dependent on fast food joints when it comes to preparingRead MoreThe Manipulation of the Public by a Small Group of Southern Fanatics as the Cause of the Civil War1632 Words   |  7 Pagesthe Public by a Small Group of Southern Fanatics as the Cause of the Civil War The American Civil War can be blamed on many reasons, one of which could be the strategy of the Southern extremist group, the ‘fire eaters’ they claimed that the Southern way of life was in danger of an abolitionist attack and was going to happen imminently. There were some very influential politicians from the South in this radical group, such as William Yancey and LouisRead MoreHow Corn Is The Most Important Crop Of The U.s.933 Words   |  4 PagesSabrina Kalam AP LanguageComposition I-Industrial Corn 10 Main Ideas/Key Concepts Corn is the most important crop in the U.S. for investment. Comment: I agree that corn is extremely useful with its genetic makeup. Since it been manufactured with highly desired genes, it makes corn accessible and easy to produce which is what the people of today deem most important. The industrial corn is found in absolutely everything. Comment: To me, this idea has an odd appeal to me. Its so strange to meRead MoreAnalysis Of Michael Pollan And Don t Blame The Eater1156 Words   |  5 Pages010 12 October 2015 Industries Will Be Industries Industry is about efficiency; ideally, turning the most profit from the least expense. Therefore, how can we trust an industry to make an ethical choice that will potentially hurt their business model? As exhumed by the articles â€Å"Escape The Western Diet† by Michael Pollan and â€Å"Don’t Blame The Eater† by David Zinczenko, the health care and food industries are not interested in suggesting we shift our diets towards a what they define as a â€Å"healthier†Read MoreFood Reflection1794 Words   |  8 Pages Before this semester, I did not take in consideration what I want to eat for healthy purposes, but rather eating any foods that I like without thinking about how it can affect my health, or buy from the supermarket and eating from my mom’s cooked meals. Then as I read the articles, it changed my opinion of food because I learned that it plays an important role in my life such as health and fitness, impacts my daily functions for school and a job because it helps me concentrate and gives me energyRead MoreThe Chief Causes Of Obesity1110 Words   |  5 Pagesobese. The chief causes of obesity are bad food choices and the reliance on the industrial food chain, and the government, the food companies and people are responsible for it. The main reason people started making bad food choices because they do not know the information of the food they eat. Most people do not know how many calories in a hamburger or a can of soda. In David Zinczenko’s article â€Å"Don’t Blame the Eater†, he states â€Å"Prepared food aren’t covered under Food and Drug Administration labellingRead MoreTaking a Look at the Omnivores Dilemma1267 Words   |  5 Pagesa moment about our whole process of eating. Pollan sets out to corn fields and natural farms, goes hunting and foraging, all in the name of coming to terms with where food really comes from in modern America and what the ramifications are for the eaters, the eaten, the economy and the environment. The results are far more than I expected them to be. I had no idea we used so much fossil fuel to get corn to grow as much as it does. There is a widespread of obesity today due to the need of agriculturalRead MoreThe Ethics Of Eating Meat Essay1504 Words   |  7 PagesThe Ethics of Eating Meat We are a nation of meat eaters. We are socialized from a young age to consume high levels of animal products. This deeply ingrained meat-eating tradition is a big part of the American standard diet. A visit to the local grocery store shows that there is no shortage of animal products. Isle by isle you see a plethora of meats, neatly packed and ready to be cooked, dairy products neatly shelved, and even candies that contain animal by-products. This is an omnivore’s utopia

Failure of Reconstruction free essay sample

After the Civil war ended in 1865, the south was in complete shambles, the economy was down, there were political struggles, and newly freed slaves needed to be included in society. All these problems called for â€Å"The Reconstruction Act of 1867†, which was instituted by the Republican Party. The goal of reconstruction was meant to reunite the nation and rebuild a southern society that was not based on slavery. Historians Kenneth M. Stampp and Eric Foner have opposite views on the success of reconstruction. Stampp believes that the steps and reforms from reconstruction had long term effect which made it successful while Foner argues that reconstruction was a waste of time and that it has not produced one useful result. Both historians debated on the success of reconstruction, however in my opinion, stronger evidence points to its failure following Foner’s argument. The effort of reconstruction did not help improve the economy and the life of African Americans in general did not change much overall. We will write a custom essay sample on Failure of Reconstruction or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Freed slaves post civil war were still uneducated and more importantly, they were still in the south. They had no place to go and no place to call home until Union General Sherman proposed the â€Å"Forty Acres and a Mule† bill. This bill essentially stated to give African American families forty acres of land along with a mule. This bill bought so much hope and relief to those with nothing only to close the bill a year later. Because the blacks did not get their promised land, they continued to be poor and resorted to sharecropping with rich southern farmers. Sharecropping is a system in which a landowner allows a tenant to use his/her land in return for a share of the crop produced on the land. In other terms, sharecropping was basically another form of slavery. African Americans were put into debt and had to work it off in an endless cycle. This system was very ineffective as it failed to help blacks economically. As mentioned in Foner’s argument, early rejection for land reform left African Americans in a position that was worse than before the war. According to W. E. B. Dubois, â€Å"the slave went free; stood a brief moment in the sun; then moved back again toward slavery. † Aside from sharecropping being similar to slavery, Dubious is clearly pointing out a true statement in describing what happened to freed  slaves. Freedom did not last long, since segregation between whites and blacks increased and they were forced into a lifestyle similar to their previous one. In 1863, when the Emancipation Proclamation was passed, all slaves in the Confederacy were permanently freed. The 13th, 14th, and 15th amendment goals were to give African Americans and other minorities a chance to strive in their communities and stop discrimination against races. However, these amendments were controversial as they did not fully protect the â€Å"minorities†. In the 14th amendment, blacks were deemed separate but equal. In U. S v. Cruickshank (1876), blacks were attacked by white supremacists, but the conviction was overturned by the federal government because it was not the state that discriminated against civil rights rather it was individuals. This is rather unfair and unjust as African Americans are being looked down upon as an inferior race and they are not receiving equal treatment. Following reconstruction, southern states imposed segregation upon African Americans and prevented them from voting. Jim Crow laws were passed in which its purpose was to keep blacks servile to whites. Black codes became a part of southern law, limiting the rights of blacks. The laws required freedmen to work as sharecroppers, and if they were found vagrant, they would be heavily fined. Southerners even prevented blacks from voting by using clever tactics that put blacks in constant fear. In 1865, a private militia called the Ku Klux Klan was established with a task of forcing free slaves to follow Black codes and those who opposed would be severely punished. This was how southerners attempted to reinstitute white supremacy. The main goal of reconstruction was to ensure the same rights of white citizens for newly freed slaves. However the goal was a complete failure as African Americans did not have equal but limited rights. As an opposing argument made by Kenneth M. Stampp, in the long run, the 14th and 15th amendment are now included in the federal constitution. African Americans now have freedom to vote and are no longer deprived of civil rights. The amendments were adopted from the reconstruction era and after a few years of radical reconstruction; African Americans received their rightful civil and political rights. The purpose of reconstruction has failed as the lives of African Americans did not change much after the civil war. The government made empty promises and instituted laws that only partially protected freedmen. The overall success of reconstruction was a failure as the south and African Americans did not have an improvement in economy.